The Decision That Created Bridgeport
Cemetery
by Glenn Tunney
Brownsville’s Bridgeport Cemetery occupies a picturesque,
out-of-the-way promontory at the perimeter of what was once
Bridgeport borough. Last week we described the location of
this historic cemetery and established that despite its age, it
was not Bridgeport’s first burying ground. That
distinction belongs to a forgotten parcel of land near the
former site of Prospect Street school, a tract that contains the
unmarked graves of many of Bridgeport’s early Quaker settlers.
In last
week’s article we also noted that by 1847, Bridgeport borough
council had decided to find land on which to establish a new
public burial ground within the borough. At its council
meeting on September 14, 1847, council resolved “that
the Burgess and Town Council meet on Thursday next at one
o’clock to examine those Lots at disposal, and select upon the
most suitable one for a Grave Yard, and report the same at the
next meeting of Council.”
The search for
a site for the new borough cemetery was quick. At its next
meeting two weeks later, council moved to purchase real estate.
“Resolved,”
read the council minutes of September 28, 1847, “that the
Burgess be instructed to article with Wm. Warf for the two acre
Lot selected by Council for a Public Grave Yard.
“Resolved
that the Burgess be instructed to make a Dublicate [sic] which
will be sufficient to raise the sum of two hundred and
sixty-five Dollars for the purchase of the Grave Yard and its
expenses, fencing etc.”
What cannot be
discerned from these council minutes is whether there were any
bodies already privately buried on the property the councilmen
had selected. Another question involves the meaning of the
term “dublicate,” which appears in the minutes of several
different 1847 council meetings. The first explanation
that comes to mind is that it is a consistent misspelling of the
word “duplicate,” yet in the context in which the word is
used in these council minutes, it does not seem to mean “a
copy,” the meaning normally associated with the word
“duplicate.”
Upon
researching the minutes of council meetings that occurred a few
years later, minutes that were authored by a different town
clerk, the word “duplicate” (correctly spelled) is found in
a similar context to that in which it was used in the 1847
minutes. In these later minutes, “duplicate” refers to
a type of tax or assessment.
If that is the
word’s meaning in the mid-nineteenth century, then the 1847
council resolution “to make a Dublicate which will be
sufficient to raise the sum of two hundred and sixty-five
Dollars for the purchase of the Grave Yard and its expenses,
fencing etc.” implies that council had to seek permission from
the borough’s citizens to buy land for the cemetery and to
assess each citizen a special tax in order to finance the
purchase.
After the
September 28 council meeting, Bridgeport burgess Samuel B. Page
met with William Warf to negotiate a price for the land council
had selected, and at the October 18, 1847 meeting, an agreement
between Warf and council was finalized.
“The Article
of Agreement,” read that meeting’s minutes, “between Wm.
Warf and Council concerning the ‘Grave Yard’ was made out
and signed.
“The
Dublicate which was decided by a majority of the Citizens for
the purchase of said Grave Yd. was made out, and amounted to two
hundred & sixty one dollars fifty-seven cts. John G.
Gregg was appointed Collector of the ‘Grave Yard’ Dublicate.”
By virtue of
that October 1847 council action, Bridgeport Cemetery was born.
It is not often that a new public cemetery is created, and
Bridgeport councilmen worked for two months to formulate rules
and regulations to govern the borough’s new cemetery. At
its December 28, 1847 meeting, those regulations were adopted in
the form of a resolution. That resolution is printed below
just as it appears in the minutes of the December 28 meeting,
without correction of town clerk R. K. McLean’s occasional
misspellings.
“Council met
in persuance of adjournment,” the council minutes read, “and
the following members were present: Burgess – Samuel B. Page;
John Riley, John Buffington, Aaron Branson, James Gue, Joseph
Johns. . . .
“The
following ordinance was passed unanimously. No. 57:
“An Ordinance
Regulating the Grave Yard.
“A majority
of the voters of the Borough of Bridgeport having, in accordance
with the Sixth Section of the Charter of said Borough,
Authorized the Burgess and Town Council to buy [sic] an extra
tax to raise sufficient funds for the purchace of a suitable Lot
for a Public Grave Yard. They have, in persuance of said
authority, levied a tax and purchased a two acre Lot from Wm
Warf near said Borough, and by virtue of authority vested in
them, do ordain the following rules for the Government of the
same.
“It shall be
the duty of the Town Council Yearly to appoint a competent
person as Sexton, whose duty it shall be to take care of the
Lot, and attend to the digging of all Graves that may be
required, for which service he shall receive the following
compensation, to be paid by the person ordering the Grave –
for all persons twelve years of age and upwards – one dollar
and fifty cents for each grave; for all persons under twelve
years of age – one dollar except when in time of hard frost,
when if necessary fifty cents more on each Grave may be added or
charged.
“It shall be
the duty of any person wishing to bury in the Ground to apply
for the same to the regular Sexton, who alone has the priviledge
of breaking Ground; unless he shall waive his priviledge to the
person applying, he shall be entitled to the regular fee.
“This Lot
shall be forever free to the Citizens of the Borough of
Bridgeport for a burying Ground. It shall also be free to
Strangers dying or who may die in the Borough.
“It shall be
further the duty of the Sexton to ascertain from every applicant
for a Grave, whether the person to be buryed be a Citizen of the
Borough. And if they should not be a Citizen of the
Borough, he shall require them to bring a permit from the
Burgess for that purpose, or in case of the absence of the
Burgess, said permit shall be signed by two members of the
Council. The Burgess shall collect for every such permit
the sum of two dollars, for which he must acct. to the Treasurer
of the Borough, who shall set apart all sums so collected as a
fund for making and repairing fences around said Lot.
“It shall be
further the duty of the Sexton, as far as practicable, when
families may require it, to so arrange the Ground that a space
may be allowed for the use of said family not exceeding fifteen
feet square; when this is not required, the Graves shall be dug
in regular rows, commencing at the most convenient point.
“The Council
hereby appoints Stephen West Sexton the ensuing year.
“This
ordinance may be altered or amended from time to time – But no
such alteration at any time to prevent the right of a citizen
from the free use of Said Lot as a burying place.
“This
ordinance to take effect from and after this date.
“R. K.
McLean, Town Clk.”
Collecting that
extra cemetery tax from the good citizens of Bridgeport was
sometimes difficult. More than one year after the tax was
enacted, the minutes of the March 19, 1849 council meeting revealed
that “Joseph John, Grave Yard Collector, appeared and was
exhonorated from collecting tax from the following persons –
viz: A. G. Booth 37 ½ cts; Joel Ball 25 cents; James C. Tuller
25 cts; John Black 25 cs; Robt. Baldwin 62 ½ cts. . . . .”
The list goes
on to include a total of 33 citizens. The largest tax due
was $1.90 owed by A. Minehart, no person owed less than 25
cents, and a total amount of $26.32 was shown as
“exhonerated” from collection, reasons unspecified.
The expense of
maintaining the cemetery caused subsequent borough councils to
regret the generosity of the 1847 council, which had made all
cemetery lots free to citizens of the borough or to strangers
who died in the borough. The original 1847 ordinance
allowed for later amendment but included the stipulation that
the right of a Bridgeport citizen to free use of the cemetery as
a burying place could not be altered.
In 1855, eight
years after borough council created the cemetery, the mounting
cost of taking care of it led council to amend the 1847
ordinance. At its July 1855 meeting, council resolved that
any citizen taking a lot in the cemetery after that date for the
purpose of using it as a family burying ground would have to pay
three dollars, and those who had already purchased lots would be
assessed two dollars.
The income,
council decreed, would be used for “making and keeping up the
fences and keeping the ground in order.” Council
suggested having a committee lay out the lots in the graveyard,
number them and keep a book detailing who owned each one.
To remain in compliance with the original 1847 ordinance, the
amended ordinance stated that any person who died in the borough
and did not own a lot could still be buried in the cemetery for
free.
By 1891,
Bridgeport borough had owned and maintained the Bridgeport
Cemetery for nearly forty-five years, but maintenance costs had
continued to mount, the physical appearance of the cemetery was
deteriorating, and a new fence was needed. Council was
anxious to shed the burden of caring for the cemetery, and the
councilmen came up with a plan — a plan that created the
Bridgeport Cemetery Company, which still operates the cemetery
today. Next week, we will learn more about the people who
now give freely of their time to operate Bridgeport cemetery.
These articles appear weekly in the Sunday Uniontown HERALD-STANDARD. If you enjoy reading them, please let the editors know. You may e-mail your comments to Mike Ellis (Editor) at [email protected] or Mark O'Keefe (Managing Editor - Day) at mo'[email protected]
Readers may contact Glenn Tunney at 724-785-3201, [email protected] or 6068 National Pike East, Grindstone, PA 15442.
Click here to return to Glenn Tunney's Home Page.